Okay, I’m going to make
this short and sweet today because I’m really crunching on a deadline. In the weeks leading up to the New Year, I
was talking about discoverability and how to get the word out about your
books. On a week where I wasn’t set to
blog here, I did put up a post about blog tours; you can read about that here.
What I’m going to do today is simply follow up on a few things I
mentioned in that post and a little something extra that came up in the interim.
One comment that a
reader made was pretty interesting. She is
a regular blogger, has hosted guest posts, done giveaways, and has published a slew of
reviews. She is, in fact, one of the
first bloggers I ever “met” and I hold her responsible, for better or worse,
for getting the ball rolling for Draw the
Dark. (She can deny it, but I know
people read her blog.) So when this
woman talks, I listen. Her take on
guests posts was fascinating: she felt they really weren’t all that useful for
her as a blogger and reviewer; that people headed to her blog because they
wanted to hear from and had developed an attachment to her, not because they
were all that excited or interested in whomever she might interview. Which was pretty intriguing.
Conversely, I also know
of a blogger whose readers love when
she does interviews—but that’s because her blog’s been set up that way from the
get-go. She’s very clear that this section of her blog is devoted to
interviews; this section to reviews; this section to her thoughts about books
in general; this section to her own
work . . . Getting the picture? She’s a
blogger who’s diversified; the people who read her interviews are not the same
who might read her thoughts on the best middle grade horror books (as one
example).
As a reader of a very
few blogs—there are only so many hours in my week—I can tell you, for a fact, that
I regularly go to one writer’s blog every week for one post only. She has other
posts during the week; she gives away free fiction; but I’m not interested in
that. I’m interested in only one
particular area she chooses to blog about, and that’s the day I’ll drop by.
So I’m thinking that
both my reader’s comment and my own observations about blog content ring true:
people head to a blog for a reason; because it has some identity and/or some content they’re really
interested in. They do not head to a blog because you, a writer
they may never have heard from, just happen to be posting . . . unless it’s their practice to do so
already.
See the distinction?
Anyway, all that
reinforced to me that guest posts really might not be the most efficient and effective use of
your time as a writer to get the word out. That was hammered home for
me just a day or two ago when I happened across a blog where I’d actually been invited to do a guest
post—for which I spent time I might have given to my work in progress or, say,
feeding my husband—that never appeared.
Mind you, this is a post for which I was invited and my publisher asked that I do. Come to find that the blogger put up a kind
of a blanket apology a week or so ago, talking about getting swamped, not having
been able to make the time, and so falling down on putting up the guest posts she’d
solicited authors to do.
Now, I’m not an
ogre. I don’t whip my husband (or, if I
do, he enjoys it). I don’t starve my
cats. I’m as human (and humane) as the next person,
and I really, really understand about getting behind. We all do.
I have been working nonstop for months,
every single damn day of the week, on the book whose deadline is coming up in .
. . hold on, let me check . . . three days.
(Am I done? Yes. Have I been done for a week or so? Yes.
Am I taking a weed-whacker to the thing and checking for inconsistencies
even though I know I’ll be seeing
this book again at least three more
times? Yes—but I’m a perfectionist this
way.) But I’ve not cooked the best meals
from my family; there have been nights of grilled cheese and many Sundays I’ve not
baked a cake. I’ve put off doing a lot
of things, like paying bills or seeing a movie, going out to dinner, going on vacation. I have been under virtual (self-imposed)
house arrest for months. I'm not complaining either. This
is my job. I have a contract and obligation I take seriously.
So
when somebody puts up a blog and then invites you, the writer, to do a guest
post, I think that every blogger has to understand: a writer takes time out from
her job to write something for free. That writer is providing content with the
good-faith expectation that those words will see the light of day. Will that post necessarily generate a lot of
hits and more publicity for a book?
Probably not, unless it happens to being an extremely well-traveled, highly influential blog (I
talk about this in my earlier post and how you ought to weigh the pros and
cons), or one that’s universally recognized: say, something on Horn Book,
Kirkus, or Publisher’s Weekly. (HAH! I
wish . . .)
But is it okay not to
honor the obligation to put up the guest post, especially when it really doesn’t
take all that much work to cut and paste?
To my mind, the answer is no.
When I give my word that I will do something—for example, this blog—it’s
not okay not to. I’ve taken on the obligation;
it’s a promise I’ve made, and promises . . . you gotta keep. (And, come on . . . we’re all busy. We all have things to do. I didn’t have time is really shorthand for This wasn’t a priority. Simple as that. We all the same number of hours in the day.) Barring something like illness, a death in
the family, or some catastrophe, then I must make time/find the hours to honor
that obligation. (Just as some of my fellow ADR3NALIN3ers do their blogs weeks
in advance. In other words . . . they
plan. What a concept.)
In the case of a blogger
who solicits a guest post and then doesn’t put that up . . . so not cool. A personal email to the writer who spent the
time to generate words for which she’s not getting paid is only polite. It is not okay to solicit a piece and then
never put it up. That is work and time
that I’ll never get back. That is time I
took away from making a more elaborate meal for my husband, or seeing a movie. Or sleeping.
Think about it.
Something that has
nothing to do with blogs: I think we all know that giveaways are one venue for
getting the word out about a book. In a
post about discoverability, Kris Rusch mentioned the idea of loss leaders: that is, something sold at a loss to lead consumers to other products (as, for example, forgoing a profit
on the first book in a series sold for a deep discount). In many ways, this is one reason why writers participate in communities like Wattpad, where authors make out-of-prints books available
for free or post free chapters pf a work in progress (or finished work). Until a few weeks ago, I had zero stats on this
because I’m traditionally published and so have no access to sales numbers
(better for my mental health, trust me on this). But, a few weeks ago, Audible decided to make
ASHES available as a daily deal. (Tickled me to pieces.) A week later, they followed up to let me know
how that had gone.
Let’s put it this way:
with the discount, the sales for ASHES
went up two-hundredfold in a single
day from what it had been for an entire
week prior. In addition, the bump in
sales continued for the week after the deal, with sales of the first book, even
back up at full price, going up twenty-fold.
Wow. That . . . that makes you sit
up and pay attention.
What this also suggests—actually,
screams—is that you need a very
efficient marketing arm to get the word out.
I’m still not sure how an individual would do that in a way that’s
comparable to a company like Audible, unless it’s someone who’s built up a
following over a lot of years. I suspect
that going through venues such as Goodreads or Amazon—I’m talking about people
going the indie route now—might generate the same bump in sales, provided that
the sale (or giveaway) remains in effect long enough. Audible was able to achieve for ASHES what it did because it has the
resources for an email blast that reached a ton
of customers. Their reach is huge.
By contrast, my
reach, as an individual, is teeny-tiny.
For example, when I do a giveaway on Goodreads, I’ve learned that you
have to let it go about a month in order to generate hits (I count a goodly
amount of hits as upwards of a thousand).
Is there a bump in sales afterward?
Beats me. I don’t know because I’m
not the publisher and don’t have access to those numbers. If and when I go indie, though—say, release WHITE SPACE as an e-book for overseas
distribution through Kobo and Amazon—then I’ll have some numbers . . . sort
of. That is, I might be able to track
whether or not my sales improve because of a giveaway or price reduction.
Okay, that’s all I have
time for today. That deadline just hasn’t
disappeared, so it’s time to pet the cat, feed the husband (or vice versa) and
get back to work.
2 comments:
Insightful as always. Thanks Ilsa! It might interest you to know that Amazon gives indie writers the option to make their book free from time to time. It has some trade-offs, but man-oh-man it works like gangbusters to get the word out. and boost sales.
Good luck on the deadline!!
Yes, I did know that, Sechin. If and when I do that,I'd be interested in seeing if there's a bump in sales after the initial freebie.
Back to deadline madness...
Post a Comment