by Michelle Gagnon
As part of Thrillerfest one year, they gave a special
award (if a piece of fossilized poop can be considered an award) to our
very own John Gilstrap (even though he's no longer
officially part of this blog, he'll always be the Friday guy to me).
The award was for the Worst Amazon Review, and he won for this little
nugget (no pun intended): "The glue boogers in the binding were more
captivating than Gilstrap's torpid prose."
I
know this is going to sound counter-intuitive, and for many authors,
nearly impossible, but here's my advice: don't read your reviews, ever.
Turn off that Google alert. Skip the Amazon reviews section. Ignore your GoodReads ratings. And if you must know what a blogger or traditional media reviewer is saying about your book, enlist someone you trust to skim the contents and give you the highlights.
This applies not only to negative reviews, but positive
ones. Because here's the thing. As we all know, a reader's opinion of a
book is enormously subjective. The way they approach a story can vary at
different points in their lives, or even their day. They read things
into it that you might never have intended--and they're all going to
have vastly different opinions about what worked
and what didn't. I'm always startled when I get feedback from beta
readers--everyone always manages to come up with different favorite
sections, and least favorites. So when taking their advice, I usually
try to find the commonalities, the issues everyone zeroed in on. In the
end, much of what they say is taken with a serious grain of salt.
The same applies to reviewers, naturally. Maybe Marilyn Stasio ate a bad oyster before reading your book, and the nausea she felt skewed
her experience. Maybe the Kirkus reviewer was going through a divorce,
so the way that you depicted a couple falling apart resonated too
strongly with him (or not strongly enough). I know that for my last
book, several reviewers felt the plot was tremendous, but the character
development was weak. Others loved the characters, but the story left
them cold. When writing a review, even when you loved the book, there's an irresistible inclination to find something to pick at. That's what many of us were taught to do in school; otherwise it doesn't feel like we've done the review justice.
As writers, we already have enough voices in our heads. Resist the temptation to let new ones in. This is particularly critical if you're writing a series;
if one reader hated your protagonist, do you really want that small
seed of doubt planted in your head? Do you want to be swayed by Merlin57
if he declares that you should be the next winner of the fossilized
poop award?
Even when a review is entirely positive, there are drawbacks. Say a particular reader took a shine to a
relatively minor character, and hopes to see more of her in the next installment. Should that be factored
into your writing process? I say no, not if that wasn't part of your initial vision for the
narrative.
It's a challenge not to dive into the fray--especially
since, with all the blogs out there, there are potentially dozens of
opinions on your prose just waiting to be perused. But avoid the
temptation; don't dive into the rabbit hole. If
your book is amassing lots of great reviews and accolades, you'll hear
about it from your editor, agent, and friends. But knowing precisely
what's being said can be detrimental.
*side note: I'd also advise against doing a Google Search for fossilized poop. Trust me on this one.
Showing posts with label Don't Turn Around. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Don't Turn Around. Show all posts
Friday, February 1, 2013
Friday, November 2, 2012
Enough already.
by Michelle Gagnon
I feel like there's been an increasingly acrimonious discourse lately on traditional vs. self-publishing, and frankly, I'm tired of it. I'm seeing it at conferences, online, and everywhere in between. Both camps are equally guilty here, in terms of snide comments and blatant put-downs. Those who are under contract with traditional publishing houses sniff at the fact that self-published authors skipped over hurdles to publish what they suspect (but rarely say publicly) must be drivel, or what one writer friend of mine referred to as a "tsunami of swill."
In the other camp, the self-published authors extol the fantastic revenue returns they're receiving, a far greater percentage than what they would have gotten from a standard publishing contract. They make lots of references to an archaic business model, implying that anyone who still partakes in it is a fool.
Enough already.
I don't really care how someone is published, or how many books they sell, or how much money they're making. But the overall nastiness that's becoming commonplace is off-putting. The prevailing attitude used to be, "we're all in this together" among writers, whereas now there's a schism. And that's a shame, because both models have their merits.
To those (like me) who are still publishing with the major houses: I've read wonderful novels in the past few years that failed to find a home. Sometimes the reason for that was clear--the book was aimed at a very niche market, one where publishers couldn't envision making a profit. Other times, I was at a loss to know why a particular book didn't sell. One was an amazing YA novel written by a friend of mine, who ended up self-pubbing on Wattpad. After reaching an extraordinary amount of downloads, she moved it to Amazon and started charging for it. And it's doing well- IMHO, the publishers lost out on this one.
To self-published authors: The traditional houses aren't going anywhere. People frequently point to the music industry, which is a fantastic example. What they fail to take into account is that musicians still aren't, by and large, self-producing music. Eighty-five percent of the music sold worldwide is still produced by the same music companies that were producing it a decade ago. Many of those companies have merged and/or consolidated, sure. But they're still around, for the same reason that the big 6 will still be around in a decade. Like it or not (and I'm not, personally, a huge fan of this, but so be it), most of the houses are part of much larger conglomerates. And News Corp and CBS aren't going anywhere; they're also unlikely to shed an industry that still feeds into their film and TV franchises. So, no, people who still follow the old model aren't going to be shoved out, by and large. The midlist might diminish further, but books will continue to be released by those companies well into the future.
There are pros and cons to each model. Self-published authors don't have the benefit and protection of a contract, so if Amazon decides tomorrow to change those royalty rates, they're well within their rights to do so. It's also far more difficult to secure foreign and film/tv rights when you self-pub, and that tends to be the bread and butter of traditional authors.
Traditional authors, meanwhile, do lose out on some royalties that they could potentially be getting. They also have to wait months, and occasionally years, for a book to finally appear on shelves. And advances are not what they once were.
But there's no right way and no wrong way. Write your book. Publish your book, however you prefer. But please, stop with the mud slinging. At the end of the day, we're all still pursuing the same dream.
I feel like there's been an increasingly acrimonious discourse lately on traditional vs. self-publishing, and frankly, I'm tired of it. I'm seeing it at conferences, online, and everywhere in between. Both camps are equally guilty here, in terms of snide comments and blatant put-downs. Those who are under contract with traditional publishing houses sniff at the fact that self-published authors skipped over hurdles to publish what they suspect (but rarely say publicly) must be drivel, or what one writer friend of mine referred to as a "tsunami of swill."
In the other camp, the self-published authors extol the fantastic revenue returns they're receiving, a far greater percentage than what they would have gotten from a standard publishing contract. They make lots of references to an archaic business model, implying that anyone who still partakes in it is a fool.
Enough already.
I don't really care how someone is published, or how many books they sell, or how much money they're making. But the overall nastiness that's becoming commonplace is off-putting. The prevailing attitude used to be, "we're all in this together" among writers, whereas now there's a schism. And that's a shame, because both models have their merits.
To those (like me) who are still publishing with the major houses: I've read wonderful novels in the past few years that failed to find a home. Sometimes the reason for that was clear--the book was aimed at a very niche market, one where publishers couldn't envision making a profit. Other times, I was at a loss to know why a particular book didn't sell. One was an amazing YA novel written by a friend of mine, who ended up self-pubbing on Wattpad. After reaching an extraordinary amount of downloads, she moved it to Amazon and started charging for it. And it's doing well- IMHO, the publishers lost out on this one.
To self-published authors: The traditional houses aren't going anywhere. People frequently point to the music industry, which is a fantastic example. What they fail to take into account is that musicians still aren't, by and large, self-producing music. Eighty-five percent of the music sold worldwide is still produced by the same music companies that were producing it a decade ago. Many of those companies have merged and/or consolidated, sure. But they're still around, for the same reason that the big 6 will still be around in a decade. Like it or not (and I'm not, personally, a huge fan of this, but so be it), most of the houses are part of much larger conglomerates. And News Corp and CBS aren't going anywhere; they're also unlikely to shed an industry that still feeds into their film and TV franchises. So, no, people who still follow the old model aren't going to be shoved out, by and large. The midlist might diminish further, but books will continue to be released by those companies well into the future.
There are pros and cons to each model. Self-published authors don't have the benefit and protection of a contract, so if Amazon decides tomorrow to change those royalty rates, they're well within their rights to do so. It's also far more difficult to secure foreign and film/tv rights when you self-pub, and that tends to be the bread and butter of traditional authors.
Traditional authors, meanwhile, do lose out on some royalties that they could potentially be getting. They also have to wait months, and occasionally years, for a book to finally appear on shelves. And advances are not what they once were.
But there's no right way and no wrong way. Write your book. Publish your book, however you prefer. But please, stop with the mud slinging. At the end of the day, we're all still pursuing the same dream.
Friday, September 21, 2012
My First Heartbreak
![]() |
| (That's right, my YA thriller was just released!) |
I'm part of "Epic Firsts" on Epic Reads, and they wanted us to blog about one of our personal "firsts."
In the spirit of full disclosure in the public humiliation arena, here's what I wrote...
So I was what you might call a late
bloomer, at least as far as my little corner of Rhode Island was concerned.
Most of my classmates started going out with boys in the sixth grade. Not
really dating, per se; mostly, they’d go to the movies or roller skating
(frequently under parental supervision) and hold hands. But they were
definitely considered couples by the rest of us, and we spent a serious chunk
of recess and lunch periods discussing the trials and tribulations of Liana and
Scott, Brad and Jessica, and all the other mini-marriages that popped up and
dissolved around us with the frequency and rapidity of soda pop bubbles.
Not me. Partly because my mother
insisted on cutting my hair herself (yes, by using a bowl) well into junior
high school while simultaneously forbidding even a trace of makeup (not even
mascara, to make my thin, blondish lashes look like they actually existed) to
touch my face. And, to be honest, also because I was kind of a total geek, and
everyone who had grown up with me knew it.
Then, in tenth grade, I switched
schools.
This was my chance to reinvent myself,
and I seized the opportunity. I blew all my babysitting and lawn-mowing money
on a new wardrobe, then threw massive tantrums until my mother finally caved on
the makeup thing. In fact, I was so persuasive (and such a pain in the butt),
that she even went so far as to let me get a perm. (Okay, I know that doesn’t
sound very attractive, but this was Rhode Island in the eighties. You’ll have
to trust me when I say it was all the rage.)
Day One, I was pumped. And with good
reason, as it turned out—I was switching into a tiny private school where most
of the kids had been together practically since birth. They were completely
starved for new people to talk to/look at/date.
I quickly set my sights on a senior.
(Ambitious, but go big or go home, right?) His name (which has been changed to
protect the relatively innocent) was Mark, and he was a slightly swarthier
version of Tom Cruise in Top Gun,
complete with the buzz cut and tinted aviator glasses. He liked cool bands (U2,
UB40) and was knowledgeable about artsy movies that I’d never even heard of. We
were in jazz band together (because it was obviously impossible for me to shed all my geekiness in one fell swoop); I
played the clarinet, and he was the drummer.
And by the end of the first week, he’d
asked me out.
I was completely elated. And terrified,
because now I had to somehow convince my parents to let me make the quantum
leap from makeup to dating. This, I knew, was not going to be easy.
But they turned out to be surprisingly
amenable to the idea. With one caveat: we were only allowed to date in my
house, under their supervision, for the first month. Which, of course, was
pretty much a fate worse than death.
Mark was surprisingly sweet about it
when I worked up the courage to tell him. He had a younger sister, so he
totally got it. He’d do the same thing if he was a dad.
So that Friday, Mark drove me home from
school in his beater Tercel and ate dinner with my entire family. He was funny
and charming, and I could tell that my parents were entranced by him. So much
so that they said it was okay for us to watch a movie—BY OURSELVES, no less—in
the TV room.
We were halfway through a Fellini movie
(that was boring me to tears, frankly, but I pretended to be enthralled), when
my father abruptly slammed open the door and demanded to speak with us
downstairs.
You see, innocently enough, we’d turned
off the lights. (Mark claimed that watching Fellini in a brightly lit room was
like eating caviar off a Ritz cracker, to which I nodded sagely while mentally
making a note to check on why, precisely, that would be a bad thing.) But
honestly, we had only been holding hands. Mark was so into Fellini that when I
tried to talk to him during the film, he shushed me. We hadn’t exchanged so
much as a chaste kiss yet.
Unfortunately, my father didn’t buy
that for a minute. He proceeded to spend the next half hour lecturing Mark
about how, for his day job, he worked with pregnant teenagers, while I sat
there praying for an earthquake to swallow our house whole or some other major
act of God to intervene.
Mark listened politely as the vein on
my father’s forehead pulsed like a beacon. At the end, they shook hands, and
Mark drove away. I then spent an hour screaming at my father that he was trying
to ruin my life and ensure that I remain a social pariah forever. I stormed to my
bedroom, locked myself in, and spent the rest of the weekend calling Mark’s
house (life before cell phones; he never answered), sobbing uncontrollably, and
giving my parents the silent treatment.
On Monday morning, I saw Mark across
the courtyard before morning assembly. I rushed over with my little prepared
speech, but only made it halfway there before I realized that (a) he was
bending down to kiss that gorgeous girl who sat in front of me in chemistry
class, and (b) everyone was whispering and staring at me.
I slowed to a walk, and my newly
acquired friend, Terry, ran over, grabbed my arm, and informed me in a hushed
whisper that news of my “insane” parents was all over school. Plus, Mark was
telling everyone that crazy didn’t fall far from the tree, and that he wouldn’t
be caught dead anywhere near me again, in case my dad decided to go after him
with a hatchet. Oh, and he’d also mentioned that he hated perms.
I was totally devastated. I cried for
days—not only because I’d pretty much already been picking out our china
settings, but also because it was so unbelievably humiliating. And of course, I
was convinced that not only had I been in love with Mark, but that I’d never,
ever love anyone like that again.
I ended up learning a few things from
that experience:
- I’d probably spend most of high school grounded if I didn’t get my parents to chill out and trust me a little.
- Terry was a true friend, and someone I’m still close with all these years later.
- Mark was kind of a jerk. And you know what? He friended me on Facebook recently, and he’s still single after all these years. Quite frequently, the cute boys in high school don’t age all that well. (That’s important to know, believe me.)
And that’s
the story of my first heartbreak.
Thursday, August 30, 2012
Don’t Turn Around - Book Birthday!
By Jordan Dane
@JordanDane
This is my week to post, but I couldn’t let my blog mate, Michelle Gagnon, not get a shout out for her debut YA – DON’T TURN AROUND – that was officially released by Harper Teen on Aug 28th. (Book 1 of a series.) Making a leap from writing adult thrillers to creating stories for teens is a huge endeavor. It’s reinventing yourself for another group of readers. That can be scary, yet very fulfilling in ways you never imagine.
Early reviews have been stellar too. Starred reviews are very rare. Many talented authors can go a life time without seeing one. Below are two for Michelle.
“Gagnon’s YA debut is a pulse-pounding scary-great read…[that] will have teens begging for more. Girl with the Dragon Tattoo for preteens and teens, a surefire hit.”
@JordanDane
This is my week to post, but I couldn’t let my blog mate, Michelle Gagnon, not get a shout out for her debut YA – DON’T TURN AROUND – that was officially released by Harper Teen on Aug 28th. (Book 1 of a series.) Making a leap from writing adult thrillers to creating stories for teens is a huge endeavor. It’s reinventing yourself for another group of readers. That can be scary, yet very fulfilling in ways you never imagine.
Early reviews have been stellar too. Starred reviews are very rare. Many talented authors can go a life time without seeing one. Below are two for Michelle.
"Be prepared to stay up all night reading."
~VOYA (starred review)
“Gagnon’s YA debut is a pulse-pounding scary-great read…[that] will have teens begging for more. Girl with the Dragon Tattoo for preteens and teens, a surefire hit.”
~Kirkus Reviews (starred review)
Don’t Turn Around (Series-Book #1)
by Michelle Gagnon
HarperTeen, Now Available!
Sixteen-year-old Noa has been victimized by the system ever since her parents died. Now living off the grid and trusting no one, she uses computer hacking skills to stay safely anonymous and alone. But when she wakes up on a table in an empty warehouse with an IV in her arm and no memory of how she got there, Noa starts to wish she had someone on her side.
Enter Peter Gregory, A rich kid and the leader of a hacker alliance. Peter needs people with Noa¹s talents on his team. Especially after a shady corporation called AMRF threatens his life in no uncertain terms.
But what Noa and Peter don¹t know is that she holds the key to a terrible secret, and there are those who¹d stop at nothing to silence her for good. Fans of THE GIRL WITH THE DRAGON TATTOO will devour the story of Noa, a teen soulmate to Lisbeth Sander.
Buy at these LINKS
So happy book birthday, Michelle. You've earned a victory lap! I'm very proud of you.
Buy at these LINKS
So happy book birthday, Michelle. You've earned a victory lap! I'm very proud of you.
Friday, August 24, 2012
Do Book Trailers Work?
by Michelle Gagnon
Last week, Harper Teen unveiled the book trailer for my upcoming release, DON'T TURN AROUND. Pretty cool, because they managed to snag a spot on the Entertainment Weekly website, so for a (very) brief few minutes there I almost felt famous.
And I have to say, all bias aside, I think it's a killer trailer.
But that being said, does a book trailer drive sales the same way that a film trailer does? A lot of authors spend considerable time and money having trailers produced. I did myself, a few years back, when my second adult thriller BONEYARD was released. I was pretty pleased with the result, and that remains my bestselling novel. But I have to confess, I think that has more to do with the amazing cover it had, as opposed to the trailer.
There are some trailers that, frankly, I've loved. My friend Daniel Handler has a fantastic one for his latest YA release WHY WE BROKE UP. It's laugh out loud funny; my daughter in particular loves to watch it over and over. But did it manage to drive sales? That's the frustrating thing about marketing: no one can say for sure.
So I'm curious: has a book trailer ever compelled you to purchase a book that you might not have picked up otherwise? And what are the best (and hey, why not: worst) book trailers you've ever seen?
Last week, Harper Teen unveiled the book trailer for my upcoming release, DON'T TURN AROUND. Pretty cool, because they managed to snag a spot on the Entertainment Weekly website, so for a (very) brief few minutes there I almost felt famous.
And I have to say, all bias aside, I think it's a killer trailer.
Thursday, August 9, 2012
Like, Try, Why
by Michelle Gagnon
My publisher has a new community called, "Epic Reads," which has an awesome feature. Every week they post a "Like, Try, Why" where they pick a few uber-popular books (or TV shows, or movies) and offer suggestions for the perfect follow-up read. This is so perfect for someone like me, who tends to start reading more and more slowly as I approach the end of a book that I'm loving; and I get downright teary when the book ends and there's nothing else like it on my TBR pile.
So here's an example of one of their recent "Like, Try, Whys":
Too perfect, right? Because once I'd run through everything Kristin Cashore had written, I was in such a fantasy groove I really wanted something similar, but for once Goodreads wasn't coming through for me.
And now, I know: The Girl of Fire and Thorns.
So for a fun exercise today, see if you can come up with at least one, "Like, Try, Why." Doesn't have to be long, in fact the more concise your "why" is, the better!
Anyway, here's mine:
If you Like: Try:
WHY:
Because Banished is dark and so well-written, with a slightly misfit heroine who's just discovering that she not only has powers, but that there are evil forces keen to use her for them, and that in fact she's part of a powerful legacy. And the sequel, Unforsaken, is awesome too!
Really hoping this provides more fuel for my TBR pile!
xoM
My publisher has a new community called, "Epic Reads," which has an awesome feature. Every week they post a "Like, Try, Why" where they pick a few uber-popular books (or TV shows, or movies) and offer suggestions for the perfect follow-up read. This is so perfect for someone like me, who tends to start reading more and more slowly as I approach the end of a book that I'm loving; and I get downright teary when the book ends and there's nothing else like it on my TBR pile.
So here's an example of one of their recent "Like, Try, Whys":
Too perfect, right? Because once I'd run through everything Kristin Cashore had written, I was in such a fantasy groove I really wanted something similar, but for once Goodreads wasn't coming through for me.
And now, I know: The Girl of Fire and Thorns.
So for a fun exercise today, see if you can come up with at least one, "Like, Try, Why." Doesn't have to be long, in fact the more concise your "why" is, the better!
Anyway, here's mine:
If you Like: Try:
Because Banished is dark and so well-written, with a slightly misfit heroine who's just discovering that she not only has powers, but that there are evil forces keen to use her for them, and that in fact she's part of a powerful legacy. And the sequel, Unforsaken, is awesome too!
Really hoping this provides more fuel for my TBR pile!
xoM
Thursday, August 2, 2012
The Most Mortifying Moment of My Life
by Michelle Gagnon
One of my all-time favorite books (and a popular gift for friends who write) is called, MORTIFICATION: WRITERS' STORIES OF THEIR PUBLIC SHAME.
It includes vignettes from such storied authors as Roddy Doyle, Michael Ondaatje, and Val McDermid on the most embarrassing experiences
they've ever had during their writing careers. For example, did you know that Margaret Atwood's
first-ever book signing took place in the Men's Socks and Underwear
section of a department store? Or that some of Chuck Palahniuk's fans
started throwing dinner rolls at him during an event in San Francisco?
And apparently Stephen King was once forced to sign so many books that
his fingers cracked and started to bleed.
Up until last October, my most mortifying moment as an author occurred at a local bookstore, when not a single person showed up for my reading.
And then along came Litquake.
Litquake is San Francisco's premier literary festival, a week-long celebration of the written word that features hundreds of authors reading at dozens of events. More than 16,000 people attended last year. Being asked to participate is a big deal, particularly for one of the most coveted spots.
And for the 2011 series, I was included in a great one, entitled, "These Mean Streets: Reality and Fiction Collide."
I was the only woman appearing on a slate with a former mob informant; the terrific writer, working PI, and all around great writer David Corbett; and a slew of other big names. The event was being held at Tosca Cafe, one of my favorite bars in San Francisco.
All in all, it was shaping up to be an exciting evening. Thanks largely to the fact that the event would be happening in a bar, I even managed to convince several friends who don't ordinarily attend readings to come along.
You can never predict how big the crowd will be at one of these events, but that night, Tosca was packed. Standing room only, easily a couple hundred people in the room.
I was nervous, and hadn't slept terribly well the night before. Too nervous to eat very much all day, in fact. So I did what any sane person would do--I drank a glass of wine to calm myself down.
I was scheduled to be the third reader of the evening. I sat through the first two, my mouth dry, palms slick with sweat, tapping the pages of my chapter on the table (to the growing irritation of my friends).
And then, it was my turn.
I've performed in hundreds of dance performances, and have participated in dozens of author events over the past few years. One thing I know: the minute I get up there, the nervousness dissipates and I'm fine.
So there I was, standing in front of a microphone with a spotlight bearing down on me, facing this hot, crowded room.
Initially, everything was clipping along just fine. I read the first few pages of my chapter, and the crowd seemed appreciative--at least, no one was heckling or throwing things at me.
In the middle of page five, the words started swimming before my eyes. I paused and tried hard to force them back into focus. They refused to cooperate. I realized that for the space of at least a minute, I hadn't said anything. Panicking, I tried to collect myself. I stood up tall, found my place, and got through another paragraph.
I've never fainted before in my life--never even came close. But next thing I know, I'm lying on my back with a total stranger inches from my face, yelling, "Were you locking out your knees?"
Which even in retrospect doesn't seem to be the first thing you should ask someone who has just passed out cold.
Thankfully, there was an open booth behind me. According to my friends (who delighted in detailing the exact order of events after I'd recovered slightly), I said, "I'm dizzy," then sat down hard in the booth behind me. After which I proceeded to plummet ungracefully into the lap of the woman occupying the banquette (featured in the photo above, right before we became much better acquainted).
And of course, this was the one and only time that I'd decided to wear a dress for a reading. Meaning that I pretty much flashed the entire audience. Thank God I was wearing tights.
My friends helped me outside and plied me with glasses of water and relatively fresh air (there were a lot of smokers around). Strangers came out to check on me. The rest of the reading proceeded inside; sadly, I missed most of it. As a favor, the event organizers let me get up and finish my story at the very end of the evening.
A week later, during the closing party, Litquake impresario Jack Boulware informed me that they've never had an author faint before--apparently it was the talk of the organizing committee. So much so that they're debating naming an honorary award after me next year. Word is still out on whether it will be bestowed for passing out or remaining conscious.
So now, should the editors of MORTIFICATION ever contact me, I can assuredly put Stephen King's most embarrassing moment to shame.
I'd love to hear about your most mortifying experience, either during and event or really, at any point in your life. Please. It will make me feel better.
Side note: My publisher just released a FREE prequel novella that includes a sneak preview of my upcoming release DON'T TURN AROUND. It can be downloaded to pretty much any eReader or smartphone out there by clicking here.
![]() |
| Pre-faint. I fell into the lap of the woman yawning behind me. She sure woke up quick... |
It includes vignettes from such storied authors as Roddy Doyle, Michael Ondaatje, and Val McDermid on the most embarrassing experiences
they've ever had during their writing careers. For example, did you know that Margaret Atwood's
first-ever book signing took place in the Men's Socks and Underwear
section of a department store? Or that some of Chuck Palahniuk's fans
started throwing dinner rolls at him during an event in San Francisco?
And apparently Stephen King was once forced to sign so many books that
his fingers cracked and started to bleed.Up until last October, my most mortifying moment as an author occurred at a local bookstore, when not a single person showed up for my reading.
And then along came Litquake.
Litquake is San Francisco's premier literary festival, a week-long celebration of the written word that features hundreds of authors reading at dozens of events. More than 16,000 people attended last year. Being asked to participate is a big deal, particularly for one of the most coveted spots.
And for the 2011 series, I was included in a great one, entitled, "These Mean Streets: Reality and Fiction Collide."
I was the only woman appearing on a slate with a former mob informant; the terrific writer, working PI, and all around great writer David Corbett; and a slew of other big names. The event was being held at Tosca Cafe, one of my favorite bars in San Francisco.
All in all, it was shaping up to be an exciting evening. Thanks largely to the fact that the event would be happening in a bar, I even managed to convince several friends who don't ordinarily attend readings to come along.
You can never predict how big the crowd will be at one of these events, but that night, Tosca was packed. Standing room only, easily a couple hundred people in the room.
I was nervous, and hadn't slept terribly well the night before. Too nervous to eat very much all day, in fact. So I did what any sane person would do--I drank a glass of wine to calm myself down.
I was scheduled to be the third reader of the evening. I sat through the first two, my mouth dry, palms slick with sweat, tapping the pages of my chapter on the table (to the growing irritation of my friends).
And then, it was my turn.
I've performed in hundreds of dance performances, and have participated in dozens of author events over the past few years. One thing I know: the minute I get up there, the nervousness dissipates and I'm fine.
So there I was, standing in front of a microphone with a spotlight bearing down on me, facing this hot, crowded room.
Initially, everything was clipping along just fine. I read the first few pages of my chapter, and the crowd seemed appreciative--at least, no one was heckling or throwing things at me.
In the middle of page five, the words started swimming before my eyes. I paused and tried hard to force them back into focus. They refused to cooperate. I realized that for the space of at least a minute, I hadn't said anything. Panicking, I tried to collect myself. I stood up tall, found my place, and got through another paragraph.
I've never fainted before in my life--never even came close. But next thing I know, I'm lying on my back with a total stranger inches from my face, yelling, "Were you locking out your knees?"
Which even in retrospect doesn't seem to be the first thing you should ask someone who has just passed out cold.
Thankfully, there was an open booth behind me. According to my friends (who delighted in detailing the exact order of events after I'd recovered slightly), I said, "I'm dizzy," then sat down hard in the booth behind me. After which I proceeded to plummet ungracefully into the lap of the woman occupying the banquette (featured in the photo above, right before we became much better acquainted).
And of course, this was the one and only time that I'd decided to wear a dress for a reading. Meaning that I pretty much flashed the entire audience. Thank God I was wearing tights.
My friends helped me outside and plied me with glasses of water and relatively fresh air (there were a lot of smokers around). Strangers came out to check on me. The rest of the reading proceeded inside; sadly, I missed most of it. As a favor, the event organizers let me get up and finish my story at the very end of the evening.
A week later, during the closing party, Litquake impresario Jack Boulware informed me that they've never had an author faint before--apparently it was the talk of the organizing committee. So much so that they're debating naming an honorary award after me next year. Word is still out on whether it will be bestowed for passing out or remaining conscious.
So now, should the editors of MORTIFICATION ever contact me, I can assuredly put Stephen King's most embarrassing moment to shame.
I'd love to hear about your most mortifying experience, either during and event or really, at any point in your life. Please. It will make me feel better.
Side note: My publisher just released a FREE prequel novella that includes a sneak preview of my upcoming release DON'T TURN AROUND. It can be downloaded to pretty much any eReader or smartphone out there by clicking here.
Friday, July 27, 2012
The Great Reveal
by Michelle Gagnon
Lately, there's been a lot of "reveals" in Young Adult fiction. One of my favorites was what they did for bestselling author Cassandra Clare's next release, CLOCKWORK PRINCESS. They let fans control the cover reveal; initially the cover was hidden behind a "veil" that only tweeting readers could remove.
And it was a huge success. Within two hours, over 30,000 tweets resulted in a full display of the cover. But it didn't end there: #ClockworkPrincess trended worldwide that day, and the tweet tally rapidly approached and passed the 150,000 mark.
Which was astonishing, and definitely eye-opening for a lot of publishers. There's always a question as to how social networks can be used to promote a book, and this was a clear success story.
My publisher has decided to try to do something similar with my YA debut DON'T TURN AROUND. Starting today, clicking on this link will reveal book chapters on Facebook: the more "Likes" the page gets, the more of the book will be "unlocked." By the end, if all goes as planned, the first five chapters of the book will have been made available (which is a fairly significant chunk of it!) I think it's a cool idea, and an interesting way to get people engaged with the story early.
We'll also be debuting the book trailer on Entertainment Weekly's "Books" page in a few weeks - I haven't seen it yet myself, and am excited to check it out!
So what do you all think? Is this too gimmicky for you, or do you like the idea of fan participation being part of a reveal?
Lately, there's been a lot of "reveals" in Young Adult fiction. One of my favorites was what they did for bestselling author Cassandra Clare's next release, CLOCKWORK PRINCESS. They let fans control the cover reveal; initially the cover was hidden behind a "veil" that only tweeting readers could remove.
And it was a huge success. Within two hours, over 30,000 tweets resulted in a full display of the cover. But it didn't end there: #ClockworkPrincess trended worldwide that day, and the tweet tally rapidly approached and passed the 150,000 mark.
Which was astonishing, and definitely eye-opening for a lot of publishers. There's always a question as to how social networks can be used to promote a book, and this was a clear success story.
My publisher has decided to try to do something similar with my YA debut DON'T TURN AROUND. Starting today, clicking on this link will reveal book chapters on Facebook: the more "Likes" the page gets, the more of the book will be "unlocked." By the end, if all goes as planned, the first five chapters of the book will have been made available (which is a fairly significant chunk of it!) I think it's a cool idea, and an interesting way to get people engaged with the story early.
We'll also be debuting the book trailer on Entertainment Weekly's "Books" page in a few weeks - I haven't seen it yet myself, and am excited to check it out!
So what do you all think? Is this too gimmicky for you, or do you like the idea of fan participation being part of a reveal?
Thursday, July 26, 2012
ARC Giveaway! Win! Win! Win!
by Michelle Gagnon
Hi folks! I'll have a full post tomorrow (on really cool new Cover Reveals, so be sure to tune in for that!) But I wanted to hijack this space today to share a way that you can win a FREE BOOK! That's right: absolutely, 100% free with no further obligation, spam, or other strange requirements/hassles (learned this one the hard way myself- NEVER click on a link for a free iPad! I'm still digging my way out of a stack of unwanted magazine & dvd subscriptions and cosmetics).
HarperTeen is giving away TONS of copies of my upcoming release DON'T TURN AROUND, which has received starred reviews from Kirkus and Voya, and was just chosen for the Autumn 2012 Kids' Indie Next List - "Inspired Recommmendations for Kids from Indie Booksellers."
And it's super easy to enter! Just RT this on Twitter:
@EpicReads Off the grid. On the run. DON'T TURN AROUND by @michelle_gagnon http://vsb.li/zJ3A8c RT for a chance to win!
And/or on Goodreads, Click here to enter.
Good luck!
And with that, I release this post [runs away laughing evilly...]
Hi folks! I'll have a full post tomorrow (on really cool new Cover Reveals, so be sure to tune in for that!) But I wanted to hijack this space today to share a way that you can win a FREE BOOK! That's right: absolutely, 100% free with no further obligation, spam, or other strange requirements/hassles (learned this one the hard way myself- NEVER click on a link for a free iPad! I'm still digging my way out of a stack of unwanted magazine & dvd subscriptions and cosmetics).
HarperTeen is giving away TONS of copies of my upcoming release DON'T TURN AROUND, which has received starred reviews from Kirkus and Voya, and was just chosen for the Autumn 2012 Kids' Indie Next List - "Inspired Recommmendations for Kids from Indie Booksellers."
And it's super easy to enter! Just RT this on Twitter:
@EpicReads Off the grid. On the run. DON'T TURN AROUND by @michelle_gagnon http://vsb.li/zJ3A8c RT for a chance to win!
And/or on Goodreads, Click here to enter.
Good luck!
And with that, I release this post [runs away laughing evilly...]
Friday, March 9, 2012
And then, just as the book was about to end, she...
by Michelle Gagnon
I've been reading a lot of great YA lit lately, and one thing I've noticed is that there are a ton of cliffhangers. Usually most of the story wraps up, but something happens--usually on the final page--that leaves the reader hanging (and, hopefully, thirsting for the next installment).
But it is necessary? Is there something unsatisfying about finishing a book that leaves loose threads dangling, especially since you're usually forced to wait a year to find out what happened? Or is that part of what gets a reader hooked on a series and coming back for more?
It reminds me of the traditional soap opera tenet of ending every episode with a da-duh-da! moment, where just as the couple is embracing, someone walks in with a gun.
True Blood specializes in these; the ending of pretty much every episode is a cliffhanger, and the next week kicks off by repeating the same scene. Sometimes it turns out that to be a bait and switch; Sookie opens the fridge and screams- fade to black. The next week, we discover that she just found out the mayonnaise expired.
But then, consider The HUNGER GAMES. At the end of the book, the game was over, and the implication was that the characters were well on their way to living happily ever after. Loved that ending, and it certainly didn't stop me from buying the second and third books when they came out.
I guess I'm wondering what the advantages of a cliffhanger ending are, as opposed to tying everything up nicely. Is the fear that readers won't come back, even if they loved the first book? Does a cliffhanger put you off a book, or keep you coming back for more?
I've been reading a lot of great YA lit lately, and one thing I've noticed is that there are a ton of cliffhangers. Usually most of the story wraps up, but something happens--usually on the final page--that leaves the reader hanging (and, hopefully, thirsting for the next installment).
But it is necessary? Is there something unsatisfying about finishing a book that leaves loose threads dangling, especially since you're usually forced to wait a year to find out what happened? Or is that part of what gets a reader hooked on a series and coming back for more?
It reminds me of the traditional soap opera tenet of ending every episode with a da-duh-da! moment, where just as the couple is embracing, someone walks in with a gun.
True Blood specializes in these; the ending of pretty much every episode is a cliffhanger, and the next week kicks off by repeating the same scene. Sometimes it turns out that to be a bait and switch; Sookie opens the fridge and screams- fade to black. The next week, we discover that she just found out the mayonnaise expired.
But then, consider The HUNGER GAMES. At the end of the book, the game was over, and the implication was that the characters were well on their way to living happily ever after. Loved that ending, and it certainly didn't stop me from buying the second and third books when they came out.
I guess I'm wondering what the advantages of a cliffhanger ending are, as opposed to tying everything up nicely. Is the fear that readers won't come back, even if they loved the first book? Does a cliffhanger put you off a book, or keep you coming back for more?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





